MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetic ordering in semiconducting Tl<sub>0.53</sub>K<sub>0.47</sub>Fe<sub>1.64</sub>Se<sub>2</sub>single crystals studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy

2012· article· en· W1554704761 on OpenAlexaff
Z. M. Stadnik, Pu Wang, J. Żukrowski, Hangdong Wang, Chiheng Dong, Minghu Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMössbauer spectroscopyMagnetic momentHyperfine structureMaterials scienceMössbauer effectCrystallographyPhase (matter)Single crystalSpectroscopyDebye modelCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceAtomic physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy study between 4.5 and 523.2 K and in external magnetic fields (up to 90 kOe) of semiconducting Tl0.53K0.47Fe1.64Se2 single crystals are reported. Evidence is provided for a possible phase separation into the magnetic majority and minority phases. It is demonstrated that the magnetic moments of the divalent Fe atoms located at the 16i site (space group I4/m) of the majority phase and of the minority phase are antiferromagnetically ordered, with the Néel temperature T(N) = 518.0(3.6) K. The magnetic moments at 5.0 K of 2.09(1) and 2.28(2) μ(B) in these two phases are tilted from the crystallographic c axis by 18(1)° and 32(2)°, respectively. The Debye temperature of Tl0.53K0.47Fe1.64Se2 is found to be 228(4) K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207