Les rachats d’actions au Canada:motivations et impact de l’activité économique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(VF)Cet article étudie les motivations des firmes canadiennes cotées à annoncer des programmes de rachat d’actions et l’impact de l’activité économique sur ce comportement. La distribution des flux monétaires excédentaires, l’envoi d’un signal ainsi que la prévention de la dilution du bénéfice par action sont les principales motivations de ces opérations. Par ailleurs, l’étude montre que le niveau de l’activité économique a un impact sur ces motivations. Ainsi, en période de faible croissance, la motivation principale est de réduire l’asymétrie d’information, alors qu’en période de forte croissance, il s’agit plutôt d’éviter la dilution du BPA.(VA)The object of this paper is to identify the incentives of publicly traded Canadian firms to announce repurchases of their own shares and to evaluate the impact of economic growth on this decision. Firms an-nounce share repurchases to distrib-ute free cash flow, to send a signal and to prevent dilution of earnings per shares. Economic activity has an impact on those motivations. In a pe-riod of low economic growth, the principal motivation is to reduce asymmetric information while in a period of high economic growth, firms repurchase their shares in order to prevent diluting earnings per share.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it