Region-specific Pro-survival Signaling and Global Neuronal Protection by Wild-type Huntingtin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD), caused by polyglutamine expansion in huntingtin (Htt), results in severe neurodegeneration in the striatum, and to a lesser extent, cortex and hippocampus. In contrast, non-expanded huntingtin (wildtype, wtHtt) enhances pro-survival trophic factor BDNF expression and protects striatal neurons from excitotoxicity, a mechanism thought to contribute to HD pathophysiology; however, it is unknown whether these effects of wtHtt extend to other brain areas. OBJECTIVE: Test wtHtt's role in pro-survival signaling and neuroprotection in striatum, cortex and hippocampus. METHODS: Levels of nuclear phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB), a regulator of pro-survival gene transcription, and resistance to NMDA-induced apoptosis in primary neuronal cultures - hippocampal and corticostriatal co-culture -were assessed using immunocytochemistry and excitotoxicity assays, respectively. Cultures from wild-type FVB/N (WT) mice were compared with those from YAC18 mice on an FVB/N background, expressing both human, full-length wtHtt and normal levels of murine Htt. RESULTS: Basal pCREB was higher in YAC18 striatal but not cortical or hippocampal neurons; however, all three types showed decreased apoptosis in YAC18 vs. WT cultures. Increased striatal neuronal pCREB required wtHtt overexpression in both cortical and striatal neurons. Reduced response to exogenous BDNF, or its soluble scavenger TrkB-Fc, suggested enhanced BDNF signaling contributes to increased YAC18 striatal pCREB. CONCLUSION: Basal pro-survival signaling does not predict neuronal vulnerability to apoptosis in our culture system, since wtHtt overexpression elevates basal pCREB selectively in striatal neurons but is more globally neuroprotective. These results extend knowledge of the physiological roles of huntingtin, facilitating development of HD therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".