MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555701935 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v8n6p89

Universal Values, Creative Behavior and Leadership: Turkish Case

2015· article· en· W1555701935 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
İlge Kurt, Mehmet Yusuf Yahyagil

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCreativity in Education and Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsTurkishPsychologyBusinessSocial psychologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organizational creativity has become one of the major research areas in the field of organizational behavior during the last two decades. This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the association between universal individual values and employee creative behavior and explores the mediating effect of leadership on the relationship between individual values and employee creative behavior. The research sample was chosen from service sector employees owing to the fact that the role of leadership and motivation for creativity is especially important in knowledge intensive, complex and uncertain environments. Survey method was used to examine the perceptions of the respondents about individual values and leadership style, and their impact on self-perceived creative behavior. Hierarchical regression and Sobel Test were applied to examine the mediating effect of leadership on individual values and employee creative behavior relationship. The results show that the individual value dimensions of self direction, achievement, and universalism explain the majority of variance in employee creative behavior. The findings of both the hierarchical multiple regression analysis and the Sobel test support the partial mediating effect of leadership on individual values and employee creative behavior relationship. The originality of the paper is related to the attempt for understanding the mediating effect of leadership on individual values and creativity relationship which has been under-researched in the literature. Furthermore, the study intends to contribute to a new and important research agenda through the examination of the relationship between universal basic values and employee creative behavior in a sample of Turkish employees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.443
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.063 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207