Region‐Specific Expression of Aquaporin Subtypes in Equine Testis, Epididymis, and Ductus Deferens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The process of water movement in the excurrent duct system of the male reproductive tract is pivotal for establishment of male fertility. The objective was to elucidate expression of aquaporin (AQP) water channels in the stallion reproductive tract. Real-time RT-PCR detected expression of AQP0-5 and AQP7-11 in testis, epididymis, and ductus deferens of mature stallions. There were two main expression patterns: (1) higher expression in testis than in epididymis and ductus deferens (AQP0, -4, -5, -8, -10, and -11); and (2) lower expression in testis than in epididymis and ductus deferens (AQP1, -3, -7, and -9). Overall, we inferred that fluid transport in the stallion testicle involved a collaboration of AQP subtypes (primarily AQP2, -5, -7, and -8). Based on immunohistochemistry, expression of AQP subtypes analyzed (i.e., AQP0, -2, -5, and -9) was localized to Leydig cells and elongated and round spermatids. Functional significance of AQP expression by Leydig cells remained uncertain. In elongated and round spermatids, AQP s likely contributed to the volume reduction observed during spermatogenesis. Subtypes AQP2 and AQP9 were the predominant forms expressed in epididymal tissue. Regulation of AQP2 expression, especially in the epididymal head, seemed to occur at the post-transcriptional level, as protein expression upon immunohistochemistry was pronounced, despite low transcript abundance. In epididymal tissue, AQPs likely contributed to fluid resorbtion, given their localization on the apical membrane of principal cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".