MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1555894276 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab63

63 IMPROVED IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE EMBRYOS PRODUCED BY NUCLEAR TRANSFER, IVF AND PARTHENOGENESIS

2004· article· en· W1555894276 on OpenAlexafffund
Dagmar Sage, Petra Hassel, Björn Petersen, Wiebke Mysegades, Petra Westermann, Andrea Lucas‐Hahn, H. Niemann

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyParthenogenesisEmbryoBiologyEmbryo transferEmbryogenesisEmbryo cultureIn vitroChemistryCell biologyGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porcine nuclear transfer (NT) is an inefficient process and it is necessary to use as many as 120 NT embryos for each foster mother to obtain small litters of live piglets. In these experiments, we evaluated the effects of culture atmosphere and medium on the development of NT embryos by monitoring blastocyst rate and cell number of Day 6 blastocysts. Age matched IVF and parthenogenetic embryos were also evaluated for comparison. For all experiments a pool of oocytes was aspirated from ovaries collected in a local abattoir. Following aspiration, oocytes were allowed to mature for 40 h in North Carolina State University (NCSU)-37 medium (supplemented with cAMP and hCG/eCG for the first 22 h). After removal of the cumulus cells, denuded oocytes with polar bodies were selected for NT, enucleated, fused with fetal fibroblasts, and sequentially activated electrically and chemically by 3 h of treatment with 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP). A second group of oocytes from the same denuded pool were maintained in TL-HEPES medium and activated in parallel with the NT group to produce parthenogenetic embryos. A third group was fertilized with frozen-thawed epididymal semen and co-cultured for ~12 h to give IVF embryos. All three treatment groups were subdivided into a control subgroup and an experimental subgroup. In the first experiment, we compared the effects of atmosphere (20% vs. 5% oxygen) on in vitro embryonic development in NCSU-23 medium. In the second experiment, we used only the 5% oxygen concentration and compared different culture media. One subgroup was maintained in standard NCSU-23 medium and the second subgroup was cultured in a two-step system for the first 58 h in modified NCSU-23 (without glucose but supplemented with 2.0 mM lactate and 0.2 mM pyruvate), followed by addition of glucose to give a final concentration of 5.55 mM. Data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance and chi square test. Blastocyst rate and mean cell number in all three embryo groups were improved under 5% oxygen. The most dramatic effect was observed in the NT group, in which the blastocyst rate increased significantly (P < 0.001) from 6.7% ± 5.9 (n = 279) to 19.6% ± 8.9 (n = 250) and mean cell number increased from 17.7 ± 12.1 to 25.8 ± 10.3 cells per blastocyst. With 5% oxygen there was also an increase of blastocyst rates and mean cell numbers in both IVF and parthenogenetic groups. In the second experiment, blastocyst rate for NT embryos increased significantly (P < 0.05) from 21.8% ± 7.6 (n = 242) in conventional NCSU-23 to 31.5% ± 11.0 (n = 271) in the modified system whereas there was almost no difference in the mean cell number of both groups (29.2 ± 4.3 vs. 31.5 ± 5.3). In the groups of IVF and parthenogenetic embryos no difference was found. These results indicate that both the reduced oxygen and the modified culture medium are important for pre-implantation development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207