Influence of FLT3‐internal tandem duplication allele burden and white blood cell count on the outcome in patients with intermediate‐risk karyotype acute myeloid leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), testing for fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) and nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations can allow for further prognostic subclassification, but less is known about the effects of FLT3-ITD allele burden and presenting white blood cell count (WBC) within molecular subgroups. METHODS: The authors retrospectively assessed 206 adult patients who had AML with an intermediate-risk karyotype and who received treatment on a uniform induction and consolidation chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS: The presenting WBC was a prognostic factor for survival only in patients who had an FLT3-ITD mutation. On multivariate analysis, after correcting for age, WBC, secondary AML, and blast percentage, nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1)-mutated/FLT3-ITD-negative patients had superior overall survival compared with patients in the other molecular subgroups. Patients who had FLT3-ITD mutations had an inferior overall survival compared with patients who had NPM1 wild-type/FLT3-negative disease, and patients who had low or intermediate levels of the FLT-ITD of mutant allele had overall and disease-free survival similar to those in patients who had high-level mutations. CONCLUSIONS: NPM1 and FLT3-ITD status, age, WBC, and secondary AML were identified as important prognostic variables that can help to risk stratify patients with AML who have intermediate-risk cytogenetics. FLT3 allele burden had no significant influence on outcomes after correcting for other variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".