MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556385144 · doi:10.1353/lac.2006.0019

Libricide: The Regime-Sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the Twentieth Century (review)

2006· article· en· W1556385144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Kaser

Bibliographic record

VenueLibraries & culture · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)HistoryIdeologyPoliticsClassicsBattleLiteratureLawArtPolitical scienceAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Libricide: The Regime-Sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the Twentieth Century David Kaser Libricide: The Regime-Sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the Twentieth Century. By Rebecca Knuth . Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2003. 277 pp. $39.95. ISBN 0-275-98088-X. "As good almost kill a man as kill a good book," wrote John Milton in his spirited essay "Areopagitica" in defense of press freedom some 360 years ago. He was perhaps the first writer to suggest a kinship between the destruction of books and the destruction of human beings. Although the single-word title of this monograph—Libricide—is a relatively recent coinage in the English language, dating back only about a century and a half, the phenomenon of intentional library destruction is of great antiquity. Perhaps since the beginning of writing libraries have been destroyed not only by natural cataclysm but also due to vandalism, misplaced political or religious concerns, reciprocity, carelessness, and overzealous bigotry. Two sobering examples are the burning of the national libraries of Canada and of the United States during the War of 1812. In this volume author Rebecca Knuth, a professor in the library and information science program at the University of Hawaii, invokes that single word libricide for her theme. After summarily disposing in her first few pages of the longer history of desultory library destruction, she goes into detailed accounts of recent purposeful library depredations (those of the last three-score years or so) involving ideology-driven, regime-sponsored, systematic destruction of book collections intended to bring about the suppression of an entire populace, culture, and/or political will. Hers is a sobering story indeed. The main burden of Knuth's study begins with the destruction of sixteen thousand books ripped out of the Jewish community center in Frankfurt during theso-called Kristallnacht violence in 1933. It then continues in great detail through the subsequent dozen years of Nazi attempts to assure that "the entire memory [End Page 268] [of Judaism as documented] . . . in its books and libraries, was in German [i.e.,non-Jewish] hands[,] . . . serving as archaic documents of a lost culture" (86). In subsequent chapters the author links other politically motivated efforts todestroy books and libraries elsewhere in the world in support of broader attemptsat genocide or ethnocide. Her second chapter documents in considerable detailefforts to use libricide as a prime weapon in the struggle for the political domination of greater Serbia. Subsequent chapters then report seriatim on more recent libricidal activities still ongoing in the Middle East. The author then proceeds to Mao's Revolution in China (an account that seems to this reviewer to be chronologically misplaced) as well as to other subsequent struggles in war-torn Tibet and Laos. Although this is not a pleasant book to read, Knuth is a careful scholar and an engaging writer. Of the three recent books on this same general theme read by this reviewer, hers is easily the most thorough and compelling. It is comprehensively researched, fully documented, and well annotated. David Kaser Indiana University, Bloomington Copyright © 2006 University of Texas Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibraries & cultureSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207