Reconstitution of High Affinity Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) Receptors in Haemopoietic Cells Transfected with the Cloned Human LIF Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
cDNA clones encoding the human leukaemia inhibitory factor (hLIF) receptor were isolated by screening a placental cDNA expression library in COS-7 cells with 125I-hLIF. The cloned LIF receptor is a member of the haemopoietin receptor family and comprises a signal sequence (44 amino acids), an extracellular region of two haemopoietin receptor domains and three fibronectin type III domains (789 amino acids), a transmembrane domain (26 amino acids) and a cytoplasmic domain (238 amino acids). The LIF receptor is expressed in COS-7 cells as a 190 kDa glycoprotein that specifically binds human LIF with low affinity, but does not bind mouse LIF. Clones encoding a soluble form of the homologous mouse LIF receptor have been isolated, suggesting complex interactions between the various forms of LIF ligand and receptor in vivo. The LIF receptor is most related to the gp130 signal-transducing component of the IL-6 receptor, a feature that may provide a molecular basis for the intertwined biologies of LIF and IL-6 in the absence of obvious structural similarly between the ligands. Mouse B9 plasmacytoma cells transfected with the human LIF receptor display novel high affinity LIF receptors that are presumed to consist of transfected receptors in association with endogenous mouse high affinity-converting subunits. Unlike the low affinity human LIF receptor, the mixed species high affinity receptor is capable of binding mouse LIF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".