MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556667695 · doi:10.25011/cim.v33i1.11833

Mutations of the TGFBR2 gene in Chinese patients with Marfan-related syndrome

2010· article· en· W1556667695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
JinLan Chen, BuYun Li, Jianguo Hu, YiBo Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissense mutationMarfan syndromeMutationGeneticsGeneCoding regionMedicinegenomic DNABiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Transforming growth factor beta receptors II gene (TGFBR2) mutations associated with Marfan syndrome and Marfan-associated disorders have been investigated. However, such studies are limited in China. To obtain more information about TGFBR2 mutations, we analyzed 6 unrelated Chinese patients with Marfan-associated disorders and without ocular manifestation. METHODS: The genomic DNA from blood leukocytes of these 6 patients and their relatives was isolated, and the entire coding region of TGFBR2 was amplified using PCR. We determined the sequence of TGFBR2 with the ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer. RESULTS: Three mutations were identified in TGFBR2. Two mutations were associated with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), which were distributed as following: one missense mutation R528C (caused by a 1582C > T substitution) and one polymorphism T315M (a rare SNP). The third mutation was a novel silent mutation associated with MFS2, which was K291K caused by an 873 C > T substitution. CONCLUSIONS: The TGFBR2 gene missense mutations are possibly causative mutations of Loeys-Dietz syndrome. This result suggests an increase in the mutation spectrum of Marfan-related disorders in China and possibly world-wide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207