MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1556802386 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab48

48 PREGNANCY AND FETAL CHARACTERISTICS AFTER TRANSFER OF VITRIFIED IN VIVO AND CLONED BOVINE EMBRYOS

2004· article· en· W1556802386 on OpenAlexfundno aff
P. Lonergan, A.C.O. Evans, E. Boland, D. Rizos, Li‐Ying Sung, Fuliang Du, S. Chaubal, Seán Fair, Erik Scraggs, P. Duffy, Jie Xu, X. Yang, Xiuchun Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsConceptusAndrologyFetusIn vivoEmbryoBiologyEmbryo transferTheriogenologyEmbryo culturePlacentaVitrificationBlastocystPregnancyCryopreservationEmbryogenesisMedicineBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was conducted to examine pregnancy progression and fetal characteristics following transfer of vitrified bovine nuclear transfer (NT) vs. in vivo-derived (Vivo) embryos. Nuclear transfer was conducted using skin fibroblast cells derived from cultured ear explants taken from an elite Holstein-Friesian dairy cow. Expanding and hatching blastocysts on Day 7 were vitrified using liquid nitrogen surface vitrification (Shen et al. 2004 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16, 158). Day 7 in vivo embryos, produced using standard superovulation procedures applied to Holstein-Friesian heifers (n = 6), were vitrified in the same way. Following warming, embryos were transferred to synchronized recipients (2 per recipient; NT: n = 81 recipients; Vivo: n = 20 recipients). Pregnancies were monitored by ultrasound scanning on Days 25, 45, and 75, and a sample of animals was slaughtered at each time point to recover the fetus/placenta for further analyses. On Day 25, the entire conceptus was weighed together; on Day 45, the fetus and placenta were weighed separately; on Day 75, the fetus was dissected and the major organs were weighed. Significantly more animals remained pregnant after transfer of in vivo-derived embryos than NT embryos at all time points: Day 25 (95.0 vs. 61.7%, P < 0.01), Day 45 (93.3 vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001), and Day 75 (90.9 vs. 19.8%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference (P = 0.10) in the weight of the conceptus on Day 25 from NT transfers (1.14 ± 0.23 g, n = 8) vs. Vivo transfers (0.75 ± 0.19 g, n = 8). On Day 45, there was no significant difference in the weight of either fetus (P = 0.393) or membranes (P = 0.167) between NT embryos (fetus: 2.76 ± 0.40 g, n = 12; membranes 59.0 ± 10.0 g, n = 11) or in vivo-derived embryos (fetus: 2.60 ± 0.15 g, n = 6; membranes 41.8 ± 5.2 g, n = 4). However, on Day 75, the weights of the fetus and several of the major organs were heavier from NT embryos (Table 1). These data suggest that the large calf syndrome is manifested after Day 45. Table 1. Fetal characteristics on Day 75 of gestation following transfer of vitrified in vivo-derived vs. NT blastocysts This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and Development→Same topicReproductive Biology and Fertility→French-language works237,207→