MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1556817639 · doi:10.37236/1885

Words Avoiding a Reflexive Acyclic Relation

2006· article· en· W1556817639 on OpenAlex
John Dollhopf, I. P. Goulden, Curtis Greene

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsGenerating functionDiagonalInterpretation (philosophy)Series (stratigraphy)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let ${\cal A}\subseteq {\bf [n]}\times{\bf [n]}$ be a set of pairs containing the diagonal ${\cal D} = \{(i,i)\,|\, i=1,\ldots,n\}$, and such that $a\leq b$ for all $(a,b) \in {\cal A}$. We study formulae for the generating series $F_{\cal A} ({\bf x}) = \sum_w {\bf x}^w$ where the sum is over all words $w \in {\bf [n]}^*$ that avoid ${\cal A}$, i.e., $(w_i,w_{i+1})\notin {\cal A}$ for $i=1,\ldots,|w|-1$. This series is a rational function, with denominator of the form $1-\sum_{T}\mu_{{\cal A}}(T){\bf x}^T$, where the sum is over all nonempty subsets $T$ of $[n]$. Our principal focus is the case where the relation ${\cal A}$ is $\mu$-positive, i.e., $\mu_{\cal A}(T)\ge 0$ for all $T\subseteq {\bf [n]}$, in which case the form of the generating function suggests a cancellation-free combinatorial encoding of words avoiding ${\cal A}$. We supply such an interpretation for several classes of examples, including the interesting class of cycle-free (or crown-free) posets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it