Sex‐related differences in neuromuscular control: Implications for injury mechanisms or healthy stabilisation strategies?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sex-related differences in neuromuscular activation have been previously identified and are thought to be an underlying contributor to the ACL injury mechanism. During dynamic tasks evaluating the role of muscle action as it relates to joint stability is difficult since individual muscle contributions to force generation are confounded by biomechanical factors of movement. The purpose of this study was to examine sex-related differences in knee muscle action during a weight-bearing isometric exercise and identify the stabilising role of these muscles. Healthy young adults stood with their dominant leg in a boot fixed to a force platform. A force matching protocol required participants to modulate normalised ground reaction forces in various combinations of anterior-posterior, medial-lateral loads while maintaining a constant joint position. Normalised electromyographic data of eight muscles crossing the knee joint were displayed in polar plots. Patterns were quantified with an orientation analysis and mean activation magnitudes were computed. Females demonstrated symmetrical activation patterns with significantly greater activation in the rectus femoris (p = 0.037), lateral gastrocnemius (p = 0.012), and tensor fascia lata (p = 0.005) compared to males. High between-subject reliability (ICC = 0.772-0.977) was observed across groups suggesting we have identified fundamental sex-related differences in knee joint stabilisation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".