MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557089906

What's History Got to Do With It?: Reconsidering the Place of HistoricalKnowledge in Archival Work

2004· article· en· W1557089906 on OpenAlex
Tom Nesmith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchivistHumanitiesIdentity (music)SociologyEthnologyHistoryPolitical scienceArtAestheticsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the changing place of historical knowledge in archival work, particularly in Canada since the mid-twentieth century. The author begins by noting that knowledge of the history of one's country or community was the centrepiece of the early professional identity of Canadian archivists between the late-nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries, when most archivists saw themselves as historians. The article then discusses the circumstances which subsequently prompted serious questioning and sometimes rejection of historical knowledge as a key component of an archivist's expertise and professional identity. The role of historical knowledge has thus been contested and problematic for many archivists across the recent intellectual history of the Canadian archival profession. The author then points to recent archival, intellectual, and societal trends which suggest that the pendulum is swinging back, not in a simple return to the past, when archivists were largely indistinguishable from academic historians, but toward appreciation of the central place of historical knowledge in the distinctive body of knowledge, research, and daily work of the new archival profession which has emerged over the last quarter century. RESUME Cet article aborde l’evolution de la place du savoir historique dans la pratique archivistique, au Canada en particulier, depuis les annees 1950. L’auteur commence en notant que la connaissance de l’histoire de son propre pays ou de sa propre communaute etait au centre de l’identite professionnelle des archivistes canadiens entre la fin du 19e et le milieu du 20e siecles, alors que la plupart des archivistes se definissaient comme historiens. L’article commente ensuite les circonstances qui ont mene au questionnement et parfois au rejet du savoir historique comme composante-cle de l’expertise des archivistes et de leur identite professionnelle. Le role de la connaissance historique a donc ete conteste et pose probleme pour plusieurs archivistes au cours de l’histoire recente de la profession archivistique canadienne. Par une analyse des tendances recentes au niveau archivistique, intellectuel et societal, l’auteur suggere que le pendule effectue un retour vers l’arriere, non pas vers l’epoque ou les archivistes etaient indissociables des historiens, mais plutot vers une valorisation de la place centrale du savoir historique au sein de l’ensemble particulier des connaissances, des recherches et des tâches quotidiennes de la nouvelle profession archivistique qui a emerge durant le dernier quart de siecle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it