MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557097303 · doi:10.1787/131855120122

SHA-Based National Health Accounts in Thirteen OECD Countries

2004· report· en· W1557097303 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD health working papers · 2004
Typereport
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careBusinessLong-term carePrivate sectorAccommodationHealth dataEnvironmental healthMedicineEconomic growthNursingEconomicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Australia No data available for HF.2.4 (Non-profit institutions) Canada No data available for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 (Corporations) Denmark No data available for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5. Long-term nursing care (LTC) is overestimated: includes accommodation costs in all residential care facilities. Germany Hungary LTC is underestimated: it includes only LTC services financed by compulsory health insurance and cost of health manpower employed in residential care facilities (financed by local governments). Home care provided by households is not included. Japan No data available for HF.2.4. Certain services (private room charges, massage, acupuncture, etc.) not covered by insurance cannot be estimated. Korea LTC provided outside the nationally defined health sector is not included. Mexico LTC provided outside the nationally defined health sector is not included. Netherlands No separate data presented for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 due to quality of the separate items Poland LTC provided outside the nationally defined health sector is only partially included. Spain No data available for HF.2.5. LTC provided outside the nationally defined health sector is not included. Switzerland No data available for HF.2.5. LTC figure is in the upper range, partly because it includes overall costs of institutions where expenditure for nursing care, surveillance and ADL represents at least half of the total expenditure. Turkey No data available for long-term care (HC.3) and home care, furthermore providers outside the nationally defined health sector (HP.7 and HP.9) are not included. Box A1 Main departures from ICHA-HF Australia No data available for HF.2.4 (Non-profit institutions) Canada No data available for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 (Corporations) Additional category is created for "Non-consumption expenditure" Denmark No data available for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 Germany Hungary Japan No data available for HF.2.4 Under Private insurance (HF.2.2) only administration is reported. (Expenditure on benefits could not be separated from households.) Households' expenditure on some services (private room charges, massage, acupuncture, etc.) not covered by insurance are not included. Korea Central (HF.1.1.1) and local (HF.1.1.2) governments are not separately reported. Mexico Payments by municipal governments are not included No data available for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 Netherlands No data presented for HF.2.4 and HF.2.5 due to quality of the separate items Poland Expenditure by corporation includes estimates for debts by health care providers to suppliers of medical and other goods used in producing health services. Spain No data available for HF.2.5 Switzerland No data available for HF.2.5 Turkey Note: This table presents information on whether all financing agents were taken into account. It does not, however, show whether all expenditure by a particular financing agent was accounted for. (This information is provided in Box A3.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it