MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557186903 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.442

Long-term renal function and continence status in patients with

2013· article· en· W1557186903 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luis H. Braga, Armando J. Lorenzo, Sumit Davé, Maria H. Del-Valle, Antoine E. Khoury, João L. Pippi-Salle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionUrinary continenceSurgerySacrumCloacal exstrophyVesicoureteral refluxGenitourinary systemUrinary systemHydronephrosisEctopic kidneyCloacaUrologyKidneyAnatomyInternal medicineRefluxBladder exstrophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Urinary continence after cloacal repair is difficult to achieve and renal outcome in patients with cloacal malformations has been scarcely reported. As a result, we reviewed our experience with cloacal malformations to determine the status of continence and the long-term renal function in these children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1990 to 2003 identified 12 patients with cloacal malformation (1 posterior, 4 complex and 7 classical) who underwent surgical reconstruction. The confluence was defined as high (common channel >/= 3 cm) and low (< 3 cm) by cystovaginoscopy. Renal ultrasound, voiding cystouretrogram, renal scan and sacral radiograph were performed in all children. Most patients underwent 1-stage abdominoperineal pull-through, applying the principle of total urogenital sinus mobilization. We collected data regarding hydronephrosis, vesicoureteral reflux and split differential renal function. Renal outcome was evaluated based on glomerular filtration rate and age-adjusted serum creatinine values (mumol/L). Urinary continence was defined as a dry interval > 4 hours. RESULTS: Patients' mean age at surgery was 20 months (range 7-29 mo). Of the 12 children who underwent cloacal repair, 7 (58.3%) had a common channel >/= 3cm. Renal anomalies were identified in 3 of 12 (25%) girls: there were 2 solitary kidneys and 1 pelvic kidney. Lumbar-sacral radiography demonstrated bony abnormalities in 11 of the 12 (91.6%) cases: hemivertebra in 3 cases, sacral agenesis in 4 cases, hypoplastic sacrum in 3 cases and bifid sacrum in 1 case. Total urogenital sinus mobilization through an abdominoperineal approach in a single stage was performed in 8 girls. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 14 years (mean 8.5 yr). Eight (66.6%) children had dry intervals > 4 hours, 5 (62.5%) of them were on clean intermittent catheterization through a Mitrofanoff channel and 1 (12.5%) was through the urethra. The remaining 2 (25%) patients were voiding spontaneously. Three (33.3%) patients were totally incontinent, and 1 (8.3%) patient was awaiting reconstruction. The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 93.5 mL/min/1.73m(2) (range 34-152 mL/min/1.73m(2)). Four (57.1%) of 7 patients who had a common channel >/= 3 cm ended up needing augmentation cystoplasty, compared with none of the patients with a common channel < 3 cm (57.1% v. 0%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Urinary continence can be achieved in most patients with cloacal malformation at the expense of major reconstructive surgery and despite the presence of associated urological abnormalities. However, these children harbour an important risk for renal impairment later in life and should be closely monitored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesFrench-language works237,207