La montagne des chasseurs-collecteurs: saisonnalité, dangerosité, nutrition, vénération, mobilité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mountain of hunter-gatherers. I : seasonality, danger, nutrition, veneration, mobility.- This article is a reflection on what mountainous environments may represent to communities of hunter-collectors ; it deals with the strategies that could be implemented by such people to exploit these environments, and it considers the rather abstract notion of the attraction and veneration that these people may have had for such sacred areas of the landscape. The paper presents various schemes for hunter-collector mobility and discusses the concepts of “nomadism” and “semi-nomadism.” The essential framework is based on a schema devised on the basis of several years of research on the Palaeolithic in the Alps (TILLET, 2001a). This article is the first in a series that is intended to compare the paleo-alpine schema with others as revealed by Amerindian hunter-collectors from British-Columbia, Yukon and Alaska.<br />The research attempts to isolate some aspects of habitus as related to this particular set of constraints. Its objective is the identification of possible mechanisms, based on interdisciplinary contextual and synthetic comparisons, of rules of behavior in the exploitation of animal resources in mountains, without direct use of analogy. This identification seeks similarities or constants between different rules of behavior, and tries to understand them without seeking to assimilate them. The goal is to analyze the structure of unconscious and collective behaviors and to propose models to explain them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".