MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557666872 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20104119

Comparison of Feeding Lacteal- and Plasma-derived Commercial Colostrum Replacers on Fecal Scores and Pathogen Shedding in Heifer Dairy Calves

2010· article· en· W1557666872 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Bents, Nickolas Place, K.E. Leslie, Brian Nelson, Deborah M. Haines, S. Godden

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColostrumFecesAnimal scienceMedicineBiologyVeterinary medicineImmunologyMicrobiologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Failure of passive transfer (FPT), defined as serum IgG <10 mg/mL at 24-48 hours of age, is an important problem on dairy farms. If an adequate supply of high-quality colostrum is not available, producers may feed a colostrum replacer (CR) product. However, studies are lacking to compare the effects of different CR products on passive transfer and calf health during the preweaning period. The objectives of this study were to describe the effect of feeding two different commercially available CR products, one lacteal-derived (LD CR) and one plasma-derived (PD CR) on 1) serum IgG levels during the first nine weeks, 2) the risk for development of scours, and 3) the risk for fecal shedding of common enteric pathogens in the first 14 days of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207