Dopamine Receptor Homooligomers and Heterooligomers in Schizophrenia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past two decades the dopamine D2 receptor has been undoubtedly the most widely studied dopamine receptor for the therapeutic treatment of schizophrenia, as the majority of antipsychotics exhibit antagonism at this receptor. However, the cognitive symptoms of the disorder are mostly resistant to the majority of available antipsychotic treatments and, as a result, there is a critical need to develop novel therapies that ameliorate all symptoms. The recognition that dopamine receptors, such as all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), exist as oligomeric complexes has provided new avenues for drug design in the search for novel therapies. Furthermore, that it is now known that dopamine receptors can form heteromers, such as the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer, with pharmacology and function distinct from its constituent receptors, has significantly expanded the range of potential drug targets. The aim of this review is to discuss the therapeutic relevance of these dopamine receptor oligomers to schizophrenia and to address the potential value of dopamine receptor heteromers in the search for new therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it