MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence for the absence of mutations at GJB3, GJB4 and LOR in progressive symmetrical erythrokeratodermia

2010· article· en· W1557872589 on OpenAlexaff
Shiyu Wei, Youwen Zhou, T. D. Zhang, Zhen-Ming Huang, X. B. Zhang, Huilan Zhu, Bihua Liang, Li Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Dermatology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsGeneLoricrinBiologyMutationCoding region

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Progressive symmetrical erythrokeratodermia (PSEK) is a rare inherited cornification disorder characterized by symmetrical erythematous hyperkeratotic plaques. The genetic basis for PSEK is not clear. PSEK shares many clinical features with erythrokeratodermia variabilis (EKV), which is associated with mutations in genes coding for gap junction beta (GJB) 3 and 4. A mutation in the loricrin gene (LOR) was found in patients with PSEK, who were members of a family with Vohwinkel syndrome. It would therefore be of interest to determine if PSEK is also caused by mutations in these genes. AIM: To examine the mutation status of GJB3, GJB4 and LOR in patients with PSEK and in control subjects. METHODS: Genomic DNA samples from 25 patients with PSEK and 56 healthy controls were examined by sequencing analysis of the coding sequences of GJB3, GJB4 and LOR. RESULTS: There were no mutations found in any of these three genes. CONCLUSIONS: PSEK is a disorder distinct from EKV, and the true pathogenesis of PSEK remains unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental DermatologySame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207