MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1557927299 · doi:10.1353/mos.2011.a418770

One Ship in the Night

2011· article· en· W1557927299 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nina Hesse Bernhard

Bibliographic record

VenueMosaic · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingRehearsingAestheticsReflexive pronounPsychoanalysisArtVisual artsPsychologyLiteraturePhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Night black as pitch. I am swimming in the sea, the water is agreeably warm. I feel protected. Directly over my head, a shooting star, then another, and yet another. And then, on the horizon, a gigantic ship brilliantly lit. Summer 2009. Philosophers and actors meet on the Greek isle of Santorini. They fly in from all over the world, like shooting stars. A unique situation, a reunion of a special kind. We encounter one another, we exchange, we work together with Kristin Linklater. We even learn to enjoy lectures in philosophy. This confrontation with the gigantic worlds of past thought, represented by the philosophers, now comes to stand at the centre of my life in an entirely new way. Sometimes it means stress, a night black as pitch, feeling stupid, feeling spurred on to think more deeply about my life, feeling too challenged, then swept along, infected even, and frustrated. Caught up in a bubbling process, as though rehearsing a play for the first time, when I am finally able to let it all seep into me. There are no boundaries. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Everyone had given himself or herself over to the process and opened themselves up to the shared work, each as defenceless as I. Sometimes during the philosophy lectures the entire film of my career as a student played right before my eyes, and the film was Amarcordl Sometimes, for long stretches of time, I could not understand a thing and was angry with myself for feeling so stupid and for not being brave enough to say after a sentence or two, Could you explain that, could you make it clearer? Or when I want to justify myself to myself, excuse myself, defend myself on account of my Then it occurred to me that it was not a matter of ignorance. Rather, it was an undeveloped capacity in me to formulate readily in words everything I was experiencing and observing--the intuitions, images, perceptions, feelings, the interconnections of all kinds--so that the result was often a traffic jam in my head. Add to that the intensive training with Kristin Linklater, which intensified my compelling desire to speak. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] I was amused to discover that this reawakened desire to speak, this rediscovered capacity and freedom to develop my own quirky thoughts, to work with my feelings and experiences and to formulate them, did not directly have to do with the renowned philosophers; nor was it a matter of mastering some abstruse field of language-and-thought activity. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosaicSame topicHannah Arendt's Political PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207