Analyse des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines en contexte de projet au sein des entreprises publiques et privées du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ: Au sein des environnements actuels caractérisés par une grande variété de situations \nplus ou moins complexes et plus ou moins dynamiques, le management de projet est \ndevenu un levier important pour la survie et le développement des organisations. Au-delà \nde ce premier constat, force aussi est de constater que la gestion des ressources humaines \nest devenue un enjeu considérable pour une gestion efficace des organisations à court, \nmoyen et long terme. De nombreux auteurs ont montré assez clairement que c'est le capital \nhumain de l'entreprise constitué de compétences distinctives qui donne de la valeur à celleci. \nPrenant appui sur ce double constat (importance de la gestion de projet et de la fonction \nRH), nous voulons savoir si les pratiques de RH sont ajustées aux spécificités de la gestion \nde projet. Si oui, de quelles façons et pourquoi? Mais, encore de façon plus précise, nous \nvoulons savoir si ces pratiques de RH en mode projet sont différentes dans un contexte \nd'entreprise privée ou d'organisation publique. Cette réflexion constitue le coeur de notre \nrecherche pour ce mémoire. \nUne étude de recherche exploratoire sera utilisée étant donné que ce sujet a \nrarement été traité tel quel. Pour l'aspect méthodologique, nous suivrons une étude plus \nqualitative et descriptive. Un questionnaire semi-directif a été réalisé sur le site web \nwww.surveymonkey.com et diffusé par le biais d'un lien Internet intégré à un message \nd' introduction mis à disposition sur les sites Internet du PMI Lévis Québec, bottin de GP \nQuébec et envoyé à un grand nombre de gestionnaires de projet au Québec. Pour donner \nsuite à l'étude du questionnaire, un certain nombre de constats ont pu être faits au sein \ndes organisations publiques et privées au Québec. -- ABSTRACT: Within the CUITent environment characterized by a wide variety of situations more or \nless complex and more or less dynamic, project management has become an important tool \nfor survival and development organizations. Beyond this initial observation, it is also clear \nthat the management of human resources has become a major issue for the effective \nmanagement of organizations in the short, medium and long term. Many authors have \nshown quite clearly that it is the human capital of the company consisting of distinctive \ncompetencies that adds value to it. Building on these two observations (importance of \nproject management and the HR function); we want to know ifHR practices are adjusted to \nthe specific project management? If so, in what ways and why? But even more precisely, \nwe want to know if these HR practices in project mode are different in the context of \nprivate or public organization. This reflection is the heart of our research for this paper. \nA study of exploratory research will be used as the subject has rarely been treated as \nsuch. For the methodological aspect, we follow will be more qualitative and descriptive. A \nsemi-structured questionnaire was conducted on the website www.surveymonkey.com and \ndistributed through a web link embedded in an introductory message available on the \nwebsites of PMI Levis Québec, Québec and directory of GP sent to a large number of \nproject managers in Québec. Following the questionnaire survey a number of findings may \nhave been made in the public and private organizations in Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".