Analyse des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines en contexte de projet au sein des entreprises publiques et privées du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ: Au sein des environnements actuels caractérisés par une grande variété de situations plus ou moins complexes et plus ou moins dynamiques, le management de projet est devenu un levier important pour la survie et le développement des organisations. Au-delà de ce premier constat, force aussi est de constater que la gestion des ressources humaines est devenue un enjeu considérable pour une gestion efficace des organisations à court, moyen et long terme. De nombreux auteurs ont montré assez clairement que c'est le capital humain de l'entreprise constitué de compétences distinctives qui donne de la valeur à celle-ci. Prenant appui sur ce double constat (importance de la gestion de projet et de la fonction RH), nous voulons savoir si les pratiques de RH sont ajustées aux spécificités de la gestion de projet. Si oui, de quelles façons et pourquoi? Mais, encore de façon plus précise, nous voulons savoir si ces pratiques de RH en mode projet sont différentes dans un contexte d'entreprise privée ou d'organisation publique. Cette réflexion constitue le coeur de notre recherche pour ce mémoire. Une étude de recherche exploratoire sera utilisée étant donné que ce sujet a rarement été traité tel quel. Pour l'aspect méthodologique, nous suivrons une étude plus qualitative et descriptive. Un questionnaire semi-directif a été réalisé sur le site web www.surveymonkey.com et diffusé par le biais d'un lien Internet intégré à un message d'introduction mis à disposition sur les sites Internet du PMI Lévis Québec, bottin de GP Québec et envoyé à un grand nombre de gestionnaires de projet au Québec. Pour donner suite à l'étude du questionnaire, un certain nombre de constats ont pu être faits au sein des organisations publiques et privées au Québec. -- ABSTRACT: Within the current environment characterized by a wide variety of situations more or less complex and more or less dynamic, project management has become an important tool for survival and development organizations. Beyond this initial observation, it is also clear that the management of human resources has become a major issue for the effective management of organizations in the short, medium and long term. Many authors have shown quite clearly that it is the human capital of the company consisting of distinctive competencies that adds value to it. Building on these two observations (importance of project management and the HR function); we want to know ifHR practices are adjusted to the specific project management? If so, in what ways and why? But even more precisely, we want to know if these HR practices in project mode are different in the context of private or public organization. This reflection is the heart of our research for this paper. A study of exploratory research will be used as the subject has rarely been treated as such. For the methodological aspect, we follow will be more qualitative and descriptive. A semi-structured questionnaire was conducted on the website www.surveymonkey.com and distributed through a web link embedded in an introductory message available on the websites of PMI Levis Québec, Québec and directory of GP sent to a large number of project managers in Québec. Following the questionnaire survey a number of findings may have been made in the public and private organizations in Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".