MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Response to first antiepileptic drug trial predicts health outcome in epilepsy

2011· article· en· W1558414347 on OpenAlexaff
Piero Perucca, Dale C. Hesdorffer, Frank Gilliam

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeAmerican Epilepsy Society
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectEpilepsyDepression (economics)Quality of life (healthcare)Antiepileptic drugPediatricsPost-hoc analysisInternal medicineEmergency medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Failure to respond to the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) is a predictor of increased risk of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Whether response to the first AED also predicts adverse health outcomes is unknown. METHODS: This longitudinal study compared rates of major adverse health outcomes (loss of driving privileges, unemployment, divorce/separation, injury, emergency room admission, hospitalization, and death) in 33 patients who failed the first AED (cases) and 30 patients who became seizure-free with the first AED (controls). Patient data were obtained by chart review and confirmed through a structured interview with each subject at 5-7 years after starting AED treatment. We also assessed between-group differences in quality of life, depression, and adverse AED effects by using standardized instruments completed by each subject at the end of follow-up. KEY FINDINGS: The number of major adverse health outcomes was similarly high during the first year of AED treatment [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 2.64 ± 0.99 for cases and 2.50 ± 1.14 for controls], but thereafter decreased to a greater extent in controls than in cases (p < 0.001). Controls had a higher cumulative probability of experiencing ≥1 year free from major adverse health outcomes compared to cases (p = 0.002). Two cases died during the follow-up, both of sudden unexpected death. Cases had worse quality of life ratings than controls, whereas no significant between-group differences were found for measures of depression and adverse AED effects. In a post hoc analysis limited to cases, patients who became seizure-free with subsequent AED treatments showed for the first 4 years major adverse health outcome rates similar to those recorded in patients with persisting seizures. After 4 years, however, cases who achieved late seizure freedom tended to show a more favorable outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with epilepsy failing the initial AED trial are at increased risk of experiencing adverse health outcomes, at least for the first 4 years after diagnosis. Incorporating these findings into clinical decision making may aid in reducing delays in surgical referrals for pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207