MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1558525124 · doi:10.1029/2001pa000665

Structure of the upper water column in the northwest North Atlantic: Modern versus Last Glacial Maximum conditions

2002· article· en· W1558525124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoceanography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of TorontoUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPycnoclineGlobigerina bulloidesGeologyMesopelagic zoneOceanographyPhotic zoneWater columnLast Glacial MaximumWater massForaminiferaSalinityTemperature salinity diagramsGlacial periodPelagic zoneClimatologyHoloceneBenthic zonePaleontologyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the Last Glacial Maximum, the northwestern North Atlantic constituted a major conduit for Labrador and Greenland ice sheet meltwaters. Vertical density gradients in its upper water masses have been reconstructed by combining information from transfer functions based on dinocysts and from oxygen isotope measurements (δ 18 O) in planktonic foraminifera. Transfer functions yield temperature and salinity and thus potential density (σ θ ) for the warmest (August) and coldest (February) months in the photic zone. The δ 18 O values in different size fractions of epipelagic ( Globigerina bulloides ) and mesopelagic ( Neogloboquadrina pachyderma left‐coiled (Npl)) foraminifera allow us to assess σ θ gradients through the pycnocline between surface and intermediate waters, based on the calibration of a σ θ versus δ 18 O relationship from transfer function reconstructions. The size and density of Npl shells provide further constraints on these σ θ gradients. The results show the development of a very strong pycnocline during the LGM with a difference of about 3 (summer) to 1.5 (winter) σ θ units between surface and underlying waters. They indicate conditions unfavorable for vertical convection and support the hypothesis of the spreading of a shallow, low‐salinity buoyant layer over the northern North Atlantic. This layer depicted a strong E‐W gradient, with maximum seasonal contrast and minimum absolute σ θ values westward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it