Švankmajer, Sade et les possibilités infinies de la viande. Une lecture de Lunacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume Lunacy (2006), l’avant-dernier film du cineaste d’animation Jan Svankmajer, n’est pas un biopic(biographical picture) ; il s’agit d’un long metrage fictionnel, ponctue de courtes sequencesd’animation stop motion, dans lequel la figure du Marquis de Sade occupe une place de premiereimportance. Un tel scenario n’est pas sans susciter plusieurs questions : que signifie, dans lademarche de Svankmajer, la reprise des motifs associes a l’oeuvre et a la vie du Marquis de Sade ?S’agit-il seulement de mettre en scene une figure d’ecrivain bien connue, ou de cautionner, parl’intermediaire de cette meme figure, un cinema pour le moins derangeant ? Telles sont les pistesqu’explore l’auteure de cet article afin de mettre en saillance ce qui, de la pratique de l’ecrivainfrancais, integre l’atelier du cineaste tcheque. Abstract InLunacy (2006), a movie from Czech filmmaker Jan Svankmajer, the French writer Marquis deSade appears as a leading character. However, this movie is not a biopic (biographical picture): it isa fictional full-length film – including short sequences of stop motion animation – inspired by theworks of Marquis de Sade and Edgar Allan Poe. Faced with such a screenplay, some questions mustbe considered: what does imply this portrayal of life and works of Marquis de Sade? What was thepurpose of Svankmajer? Was it only to show a well-known weird writer on screen or, in a morecomplicated way, was this odd figure answering for a disturbing cinema? In this paper, the authorintends to show, at last, that Marquis de Sade and Svankmajer share many creative issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".