Waiting Before Birth: Outcomes After Fetal Listing for Heart Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following fetal diagnosis of a profound heart defect, transplantation (HTx) is an alternative to pregnancy termination or neonatal surgical palliation. Retrospective review of the cardiac and transplant databases of fetal listings for HTx between 1990 and July 2006 was undertaken to describe outcomes after listing. We identified 26 fetal listings (of 269 total listings). Diagnoses included congenital heart disease (n = 24) and cardiomyopathy (n = 2). Seven patients were delisted after birth: in five cases parents opted for surgical palliation, two clinically improved. One patient died wait-listed (stillborn). Time wait-listed as a fetus ranged from 1-41 days (median 19 days). Eighteen patients underwent HTx (median weight 2.8 kg, range 2.1-10.9 kg); median days wait-listed after birth was 22 (4 h-123 days). Two fetuses were surgically delivered at 36 weeks gestation when a donor organ became available; 11 were transplanted as neonates (<30 days). The median age at HTx was 1 month (4 h-2.6 months). Fetal listing for HTx increases the potential window of opportunity for a donor organ to become available; patients had low wait-list mortality and a fair intermediate-term outcome. Well-defined criteria for eligibility for fetal listing and priority allocation to infants over fetuses seem rational approaches for centers that offer fetal listing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".