Identification and Characterization of T Cell-Stimulating Antigens from <i>Leishmania</i> by CD4 T Cell Expression Cloning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Persistent immunity against Leishmania: infections in humans is mediated predominantly by CD4(+) T cells of the Th1 phenotype. Herein we report the expression cloning of eight Leishmania: Ags using parasite-specific T cell lines derived from an immune donor. The Ags identified by this technique include the flagellar proteins alpha- and beta-tubulin, histone H2b, ribosomal protein S4, malate dehydrogenase, and elongation factor 2, as well as two novel parasite proteins. None of these proteins have been previously reported as T cell-stimulating Ags from Leishmania: beta-tubulin-specific T cell clones generated against Leishmania: major amastigotes responded to Leishmania:-infected macrophages and dendritic cells. IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot analysis demonstrated the presence of T cells specific for several of these Ags in PBMC from self-healing cutaneous leishmaniasis patients infected with either Leishmania: tropica or L. major. The responses elicited by Leishmania: histone H2b were particularly striking in terms of frequency of histone-specific T cells in PBMC (1 T cell of 6000 PBMC) as well as the percentage of responding donors (86%, 6 of 7). Ags identified by T cells from immune donors might constitute potential vaccine candidates for leishmaniasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".