MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1560014340 · doi:10.1684/stv.2011.0599

Quelle pression artérielle chez les patients ayant une atteinte rénale

2011· article· fr· W1560014340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Michel Halimi

Bibliographic record

VenueSang thrombose vaisseaux · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il existe une relation continue entre le niveau de PA chez l’hypertendu non diabetique et le risque d’insuffisance renale chronique ; ce risque est cependant beaucoup plus eleve chez le patient Noir que chez les autres sujets. La cause de l’insuffisance renale beaucoup plus frequente chez le sujet Noir n’est pas connue, mais les hypotheses actuelles mettent en avant soit un nombre de nephrons plus faible chez ces sujets, soit un polymorphisme particulier de l’apolipoproteine 1 (qui confere une resistance naturelle a la trypanosomiase), codant pour une proteine deletere sur le plan renal (notamment au niveau du podocyte). Quelle que soit la cause de l’insuffisance renale, plus la pression arterielle est elevee, plus l’evolution vers l’insuffisance renale terminale est rapide. Les recommandations nous indiquent que la cible tensionnelle est de 130/80 mmHg chez les patients insuffisants renaux ou diabetiques ; ces cibles ont ete gardees par les anglais (recommandations britanniques de 2009, NICE – Diabete) et les canadiens sur l’hypertension arterielle (2010). Cependant, les essais therapeutiques sont moins convaincants. Certes, l’etude ADVANCE montre que la baisse de la pression arterielle jusqu’a 134 mmHg pour la systolique est associee a une moindre evolutivite de l’atteinte renale. Cependant, la baisse de la PA n’apporte pas de protection renale chez les patients insuffisants renaux Noirs americains de l’etude AASK lorsque la proteinurie initiale est faible (< 0,22 g/g de creatininurie), confirmant des meta-analyses anterieures. En pratique, chez les patients insuffisants renaux sans aucune proteinurie (et une excretion urinaire d’albumine < 300 mg/j), la baisse de la PA a des seuils tres bas n’apporte probablement pas de nephroprotection (et il n’est pas sUr que le blocage du systeme renine soit utile) : le seuil de PA de 140/9 mmHg est suffisant. Mais chez les patients proteinuriques, meme si celle-ci est mineure, la cible tensionnelle de 130/80 mmHg reste de mise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSang thrombose vaisseaux→Same topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies→French-language works237,207→