跨国界与跨语际的鲁迅翻译 (1925~1949) / A Theory of the Translations of Lu Xun’s works
Bibliographic record
Abstract
鲁迅的作品1928年被介绍到日本，1930年前后因《阿Q正传》的日译，鲁迅在日本逐渐受到敬重，开启了日本的「鲁迅学」的序幕。在东亚反法西斯的文化阵线上，作为中国的作家，鲁迅率先登上日本文坛，开辟了「弱小民族」在日本的文化阵地，让日本普罗文学界开始注意台湾与朝鲜、「满州」的作家，也打开了日本人关注「弱小民族文学」的视野。本文将以「翻译鲁迅」的现象说明中、日「地下火」之一脉相连，描述二战前国际主义的普罗文学运动的文化场域之一隅。同时从光复初期台湾文化界再生产「鲁迅的战斗精神」的文化资本，以抗议国共内战的爆发与国民党的法西斯统治，说明台湾与二、三O年代以来中、日文化界传布鲁迅战斗精神的反法西斯运动的「地下火」连成一脉的历史意义。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".