MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560220179 · doi:10.7202/1064426ar

跨国界与跨语际的鲁迅翻译 (1925~1949) / A Theory of the Translations of Lu Xun’s works

2008· article· de· W1560220179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hsu Hsiu-Hui

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2008
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsEpistemologyComputer sciencePhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

鲁迅的作品1928年被介绍到日本,1930年前后因《阿Q正传》的日译,鲁迅在日本逐渐受到敬重,开启了日本的「鲁迅学」的序幕。在东亚反法西斯的文化阵线上,作为中国的作家,鲁迅率先登上日本文坛,开辟了「弱小民族」在日本的文化阵地,让日本普罗文学界开始注意台湾与朝鲜、「满州」的作家,也打开了日本人关注「弱小民族文学」的视野。本文将以「翻译鲁迅」的现象说明中、日「地下火」之一脉相连,描述二战前国际主义的普罗文学运动的文化场域之一隅。同时从光复初期台湾文化界再生产「鲁迅的战斗精神」的文化资本,以抗议国共内战的爆发与国民党的法西斯统治,说明台湾与二、三O年代以来中、日文化界传布鲁迅战斗精神的反法西斯运动的「地下火」连成一脉的历史意义。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207