Arte pubblica e aree urbane: il caso di Barcellona, Montreal, Sydney
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public art will be described as any kind of artistic activity taking place in a public space that is motivated, designed, implemented and perceived in terms of its public nature. Starting from the 1960's western cities have adopted specific strategy of public art dealing with physical urban transformation. The use of this instrument is seen as stimulating the disposition to learn and reflect of the local community, fostering the social cohesion among and/or across groups, renovating the social fabric providing the community with a powerful means of self-representation and awareness. This paper presents three different case studies, Barcelona, Montreal,Sydney in which public art policies are associated to cultural-led urban renewal projects. Thus promoted by events as for Universal Expo, Olympics. By the examples illustrated will be possible to underline the role of culture in public urban areas, not only aesthetic, but providing also economic and social output, not only celebrative, but challenging the population to a new vision, perception and use of the urban environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it