Are House Wren <i>Troglodytes aedon</i> eggs unusually strong? Test of the predicted effect of intraspecific egg destruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of opposing selective forces, the external strength of avian eggs should be near some size‐specific optimum. However, in certain situations there should be selection on females to lay unusually strong eggs. According to one hypothesis, intraspecific egg destruction should favour increased egg strength as a means of defence against conspecific intruders. This hypothesis predicts that House Wrens Troglodytes aedon , a species well known for its tendency to destroy conspecific clutches, should be under selection for unusually strong eggs. However, the intensity of selection for strong eggs should also be modified by efficacy of nest defence against conspecific intruders in a given species (i.e. efficient nest defence by the breeding pair should weaken selection for unusually strong eggs). The goals of our study were: (1) to establish whether House Wren eggs are stronger than expected for their size; (2) to determine which structural mechanisms are responsible for their unusual strength; and (3) to test a hypothesis that, between wren species, the efficacy of nest defence and the intensity of egg‐destroying behaviour affect the intensity of selection for unusually strong eggs. Our results demonstrated that: (1) House Wren eggs are 1.9 times stronger than expected for their size; (2) their unusual strength is achieved mostly by their unusually thick shells; and (3) eggs of the House Wren (extensive paternal nest defence; male egg‐destroying behaviour suppressed during incubation) are significantly weaker structurally than eggs of the Marsh Wren Cistothorus palustris (reduced paternal nest defence; male egg‐destroying behaviour present throughout incubation). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the intraspecific egg‐destroying behaviour and the efficacy of nest defence by the breeding adults have played a role in the evolution of strength of House Wren eggs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".