MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560371673 · doi:10.1162/jinh.2000.30.3.514

<i>Kaiser and Führer: A Comparative Study of Personality and Politics</i>. By Robert G. L. Waite (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1998) 511 pp. $50.00

2000· article· en· W1560371673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconPoliticsCitationLibrary scienceMedia studiesSociologyArt historyArtPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

January 01 2000 Kaiser and Führer: A Comparative Study of Personality and Politics Kaiser and Führer: A Comparative Study of Personality and Politics. By Robert G. L.Waite (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1998) 511 pp. $50.00 Geoffrey Cocks Geoffrey Cocks Albion College Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Geoffrey Cocks Albion College Online Issn: 1530-9169 Print Issn: 0022-1953 © 1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.1999 The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2000) 30 (3): 514–515. https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh.2000.30.3.514 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Geoffrey Cocks; Kaiser and Führer: A Comparative Study of Personality and Politics. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2000; 30 (3): 514–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh.2000.30.3.514 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll JournalsThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.1999 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it