MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560701341 · doi:10.1002/9780470513422.ch10

Cytoskeletal Abnormalities in Long‐Term Embryonic CNS Transplants Isolated within Peripheral Nerve

2007· article· en· W1560701341 on OpenAlexaff
Laurie C. Doering, Albert J. Aguayo

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurofilamentBiologyPeripheral nervous systemTransplantationCentral nervous systemEmbryonic stem cellPathologyCytoskeletonNeuroscienceCell biologyNervous systemPathogenesisImmunologyImmunohistochemistryMedicineCellInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cells from the fetal central nervous system (CNS) of rat embryos survive and differentiate when transplanted into the peripheral nervous system (PNS) of adult rats. The experiments described here were aimed at investigating selected molecular and ultrastructural features of dissociated CNS cells from the telencephalon of 12-day-old embryos isolated for long periods of time within PNS segments. Neurons and glia of grafts examined 6-12 months after transplantation into the PNS developed several cytoskeletal abnormalities. In neurons, these changes included Hirano bodies within dendrites and a marked perikaryal immunoreactivity to RT97, a monoclonal antibody that normally recognizes in neuronal processes the phosphorylated 200 kDa protein subunit of neurofilaments. Rosenthal fibres were seen within the glial cells. Similar-looking abnormalities have been described in certain human and animal neurodegenerative diseases and in ageing. Although a relationship between the changes in these long-term neural transplants and such diseases is unknown, these observations provide an opportunity for studying their pathogenesis within laboratory conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207