Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vattimo, Gianni. Aesthetics and the End of Epistemology, in The Reasons of Art: Artworks and the Transformation of Philosophy, edited by Peter McCormick (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1985). Guignon, Charles. Truth as Disclosure: Art, Language, History Southern Journal of Philosophy Supp 28 (1989). Herrmann, Friedrich Wilhelm Von. Kunst und Technik Heidegger Studies 1 (1985). Held, Klaus. On the Way to a Phenomenology of World Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 30 (1999). Young, Julian. Poets and Rivers: Heidegger on Holderlin's 'Der Ister Dialogue 38 (1999). Edwards, James C. Poetic Dwelling on the Earth as a Mortal, in The Plain Sense of Things: the Fate of Religion in the Age of Normal Nihilism (University Park, Pa: Penn State University Press, 1997). Haar, Michel. Attunement and Thinking, in Heidegger: A Critical Reader, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Harrison Hall (Cambridge, UK: Blackwell, 1992). Dreyfus, Hubert. Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology, in Technology and the Politics of Knowledge, edited by Andrew Feenberg and Alastair Hannay (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995). Dreyfus, Hubert and Charles Spinosa, Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on How to Affirm Technology Man and World 30 (1997). Borgmann, Albert. Focal Things and Practices, in Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: a Philosophical Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984). Polt, Richard. Metaphysical Liberalism in Heidegger's Beitraege Political Theory 25 (1997). Ruin, Hans. The Moment of Truth: 'Augenblick' and 'Ereignis' in Heidegger Epoche 6 (1998). Hemming, Laurence Paul. Heidegger's God Thomist 62 (1998). Schurmann, Reiner. Heidegger and Meister Eckhart on Releasement Research in Phenomenology 3 (1973). Sheehan, Thomas. On Movement The Monist 64 (1981). Fell, Joseph. The Crisis of Reason Heidegger Studies 2 (1986).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".