MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561234656

Event-driven response architecture for event-based computing

2005· article· en· W1561234656 on OpenAlexaff
Vijay Dheap, Paul A. S. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceService providerService (business)Service-oriented architectureService delivery frameworkMiddleware (distributed applications)Service designDifferentiated serviceService discoveryEvent (particle physics)Data as a serviceWeb serviceSoftware engineeringDistributed computingWorld Wide WebBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Service-based computing is rapidly replacing the more-traditional approaches to architecting distributed systems. The critical advantage of service-based architectures is that they require only a specification of protocol, and not of API. As such, they engender a significantly looser coupling than prior techniques, thus facilitating seamless collaboration across systems and across administrative domains.A Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is a middleware platform that provides a service-based computing environment. The publish-find-bind paradigm at the core of SOA enables the development of service-provision software separately from the development of service-consumption software. Closer observation of each aspect in this paradigm reveals that significant developer involvement is still required to assist the interaction between service provider and consumer. Developers of service-consumer software make the decision to employ a set of service providers at development time. Some SOAs provide facilities to programmatically search, bind, and even invoke services dynamically. However, it is still assumed that knowledge of both service providers and the service provided is known at development time, or the client must supply highly-detailed information about services they wish to use. This severely limits the possibility of dynamic run-time interactions among service providers and service consumers.In this paper we introduce EDRA, the Event-Driven Response Architecture for service-based computing. EDRA is a software framework that provides an infrastructure to dynamically select client-relevant service providers during run-time. Information services selected by EDRA on behalf of clients may send notification events in case of changes in the service. In such cases, our runtime will automatically process the notification based on a selection of user-choice, system defaults, and available action services. We have implemented a prototype of our framework, and show its operation in the domain of airline services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative ResearchSame topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207