MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The opening of the Magellan Strait and its geodynamic implications

2012· article· en· W1561333455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matías C. Ghiglione, Angela Teresa Navarrete‐Rodríguez, M. González-Guillot, Gustavo Gabriel Bujalesky

Bibliographic record

VenueTerra Nova · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsGeologyRiftTectonicsNeogenePaleontologyExtensional definitionPlate tectonicsSeismologyStrike-slip tectonicsRift zoneFault (geology)QuaternarySinistral and dextralNova scotiaOceanographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terra Nova, 25, 13–20, 2013 Abstract The existence of a Neogene‐Quaternary rift system responsible for the opening of the eastern Magellan strait has been one of the more peculiar tectonic features of the southernmost Andes since its discovery more than a decade ago. However, until now there has been no explanation pinpointing the specific tectonic factors that led to the development of the rift. This work focuses on the interaction between the fault systems and the tectonic regimes that have affected Tierra del Fuego north of the South America–Scotia left lateral strike‐slip plate boundary. Due to a good match between a Jurassic extensional fault array orientation and the principal stress directions related to the strike‐slip plate boundary, we conclude that Jurassic transfer faults reactivated extensionally generating the Magellan rift system. This process was enhanced by northward continental drift, and has implications for the geodynamic behind the separation of South America from Antarctica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerra NovaSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207