MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561456084 · doi:10.9744/dimensi.33.1

USULAN STANDAR DAN EVALUASI TINGKAT PELAYANAN WALKWAY DI UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN PETRA

2005· article· en· W1561456084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan (Institute of Research and Community Outreach Petra Christian University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringGeographyMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study about the characteristics of pedestrians flow is required to design the width of walkway for a building.Base on that specific condition a Level of Service (LOS) could be proposed.The aim of this study is to identify characteristic of pedestrian that using the walkway including walking speed and pedestrian flow, to proposed and evaluated LOS of walkway at campus area.Survey was conducted at nine different locations at Petra Christian University.Pearson Correlation and Regression analysis were using to obtain the equation of relation between pedestrian characteristics that required for counting the walking speed and pedestrian flow for each LOS.The result indicate that most of walkway at Petra Christian University area have LOS = A, except for the walkway in front of telecommunication shop (wartel) nearby P building which has level of service B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it