MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561733779

Some Small, Good Things

2013· article· en· W1561733779 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah L. Bodman

Bibliographic record

VenueUWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtTributeChoseBluesStyle (visual arts)Performance artVisual artsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A collaborative zine made for World Book Night, which resulted in a free download DIY publication www.bookarts.uwe.ac.uk/13smallgt.htmThis year the work was a tribute to Raymond Carver's collection of stories Cathedral (1983), some of which were used as the basis for Robert Altman's film Short Cuts (1993). In particular we chose the story A Small, Good Thing as the starting point for this year's collaboration. An open call this website invited people to do a small, good thing, write it out and send it to us.All contributions were received by midnight on 22nd April. On World Book Night we made a low-fi, video in a very homemade style of the original film clip for Bob Dylan's Subterranean Homesick Blues, using those small, good things. contributorsAnonymous (quite a few), Craig Atkinson, Annabel Barton, John Bently, Sarah Bodman, Phil Bowden, Angie Butler, Simon Butler, Arthur Buxton, Nancy Campbell, Anna Corbett, Lilla Duignan, Su Fahy, Hazel Grainger, Charlotte Hall, Paul Laidler, Teri Makassih, Imi Maufe, Natalie McGrorty, Allil Nangi-Ud, Anne On, Jeff Rathermel, Gwen Simpson, Simon Smith, Tom Sowden, Tracy Stanton, David Sully, Gail Sully, Tribe, Barrie Tullett, Elizabeth Willow, Mark Wingrave, Philippa Wood. Special thanks to Simon Butler and Simon Smith for the original soundtrack.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.015
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2240.138

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol)Same topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207