Escritos de ferias y forjas: cuatro antologías de poesía de Quebec en México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde que Quebec fue invitado de honor de la Feria Internacional del Libro de Guadalajara en 2003, la poesía quebequense ha ganado en visibilidad en América Latina, especialmente en México.Nos interesan aquí cuatro antologías dirigidas por el poeta quebequense Bernard Pozier y publicadas en México en coedición con Les Écrits des Forges, casa editorial quebequense especializada en poesía: Poetas de Quebec (1996); Latinos del norte (2003); Aquí y ahora: 35 poetas de Québec a partir de 1960 (2003); 15 poetas de Quebec (2008).Estudiamos la manera en que estos libros exponen la poesía y la cultura quebequenses a los lectores mexicanos por medio de sus paratextos: cubiertas, títulos, prefacios y selección de autores y textos.Con este breve estudio nos proponemos dar a conocer la manera en que la poesía quebequense de habla francesa ha sido presentada al público mexicano en traducción española por los Écrits des Forges en los últimos 15 años.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".