MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1562201821 · doi:10.1029/2012jc007901

Sea surface <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> cycles and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes at landfast sea ice edges in Amundsen Gulf, Canada

2012· article· en· W1562201821 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Brent Else, R. J. Galley, Tim Papakyriakou, Lisa A. Miller, Alfonso Mucci, David G. Barber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsUpwellingSea iceGeologyOceanographyIce shelfArctic ice packEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesCryosphereClimatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In late fall, spring, and early summer, we measured the surface ocean and atmospheric partial pressures of CO2 (pCO2sw and pCO2atm, respectively) to calculate CO2 gradients (ΔpCO2 = pCO2sw − pCO2atm) and resulting fluxes along the landfast ice regions of southern Amundsen Gulf, Canada. In both the fall and spring seasons we observed positive ΔpCO2caused by wind‐driven upwelling. The presence of a landfast ice edge appeared to be an important factor in promoting this upwelling in some instances. Despite the potential for significant CO2 evasion, we calculated small fluxes during these periods due to high sea ice concentration. In summer, ΔpCO2 became strongly negative across the entire study area. Primary production no doubt played a role in the pCO2swdrawdown, but we found evidence that sea ice melt and dissolution of ice‐bound calcium carbonate crystals may also have been contributing factors. The seasonal ΔpCO2 cycle suggests a net annual sink of atmospheric CO2 for these landfast ice regions, since calculated summer uptake by the ocean was much stronger than fall/spring outgassing and occurred over a longer time period. However, we hypothesize that this balance is highly dependent on the strength of upwelling and the timing of ice formation and decay, and therefore may be influenced by interannual variability and the effects of climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→