MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562336716 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316018132.005

The Constitutional Itch

2015· book-chapter· en· W1562336716 on OpenAlexaff
Peer Zumbansen

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJudicial and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContent (measure theory)Computer scienceInternet privacyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As transnational commercial lawyers have long known, border crossing, globe-spanning economic activities and business practices prompt legal responses that extend the public–private interplay and legal pluralism of the nation-state to – literally – unchartered territory. In the transnational space of exchange and trade of the modern age, law evolves through the interplay of “transnational lift-off and juridical touchdown,” constantly re-drawing the boundaries between private agency and public authority. As for lawyers, these contemplate whether or to what degree segments of this transnational regulatory regime – the mysterious and mesmerizing lex mercatoria – should properly be called law. And whereas from the perspective of sociology and geography the evolving landscape challenges conceptions of location and boundaries, for political science the focus must be on the element of authority. In other words, the urgent political question of transnational governance regards control, the emblem of power. As the sites and trajectories of transnational governance continue to span more and more regulatory areas, the combined question of who's in charge and to whose benefit has to move into the center of an interdisciplinary engagement. Law's history of interdisciplinarity situates it well for a productive contribution to this enterprise, which is one that must go beyond lip service to the need for thinking about law and globalization from an interdisciplinary perspective; crucially, it is the normative challenge of transnational governance that prompts a reflection on its stakes, interests, and aspirations. Law's engagement with the spatialization of transnational governance regimes under postnational conditions must address the normative challenge political philosophers and political scientists have long been addressing. The question raised in this chapter is how law and, more specifically, developments in private law theory address the normative challenges of transnational private regulatory governance. The larger issue behind this question concerns private law's contribution to a legal theory of global governance, with the contention – from a historical perspective – that private law has always played a central role in social regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicJudicial and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207