Experimental investigation of hydrodynamics of gas‐solid flow in an internally circulating fluidized bed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrodynamic study of gas and solid flow in an internally circulating fluidized bed (ICFB) is made in this paper using a high‐speed camera and pressure probes for the laboratory 0.3 m × 0.27 m column having an internal draft tube. Experiments were conducted using sand particles of Geldart B and Geldart B‐D groups. At each run the standard pressure‐flow curves for both the draft tube and annular region beds, and the moving wall particle velocity in the annular bed region were measured. The effects of superficial gas velocity, static bed height, and draft tube gap height on pressure drop profiles, solid circulation patterns, and gas bypassing dynamics for the ICFB were investigated extensively. Unlike the conventional CFB, the pressure drop in ICFB is further decreased with superficial gas velocity after the minimum spouting fluidization, followed by yielding a cross‐over in the pressure drop of the annular bed compared to the draft tube. Pressure drop in the draft tube increases with an increase of static bed height and gap height between the draft tube bottom and the air distributor. The gas bypassing fraction increases with an increase in gap height and decreases with increased bed height and mean particle size. The mechanism governing the solid circulation and the pressure losses in an ICFB has been elaborated based on gas and solid dynamics obtained from the experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".