Les Risques Biotechnologiques : État de la Question dans l'Industrie Agroalimentaire Canadienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This document sums up the technological, economical, biological and statutory aspects of products issued from Canadian biotechnology, used in the fields of agribusiness, and commonly called GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms). A first section analyses the different terms (and their nuances) used in this field. A second section studies the expansion of Canadian industries in biotechnology, as well as the added values of the GMO, the characteristics of the expansion of these firms, the market of the GMO, together with the intellectual property prevailing in these industries. A third section on biology explains the stages in manufacturing transgenetic organisms. Another section tackles the uncertainties of GMO manufacture, which accounts for the risks and limits of transgenesis for health, environment and economy. This document concludes with a part on regulation and its underlying principles. To download the executive summary of the report (in French), click Keywords: GMO, agribusiness, modern biotechnology, transgenesis, genetic patent, risks, health, Intellectual property, OGM, agroalimentaire, biotechnologie moderne, transgenèse, brevetage du vivant, risques, santé, environnement, propriété intellectuelle
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".