MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of lactose on gut microbiota and metabolome of infants with cow’s milk allergy

2012· article· en· W1563194043 on OpenAlexaff
Ruggiero Francavilla, Maria Calasso, Laura Calace, Sonya Siragusa, Maurice Ndagijimana, Pamela Vernocchi, Luigia Brunetti, Giuseppe Mancino, Giuseppe Tedeschi, Elisabetta Guerzoni, Flavia Indrio, Luca Laghi, Vito L. Miniello, Marco Gobbetti, Maria De Angelis

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactoseClostridiaFood scienceMetabolomeBacteroidesLactobacillusGut floraInfant formulaFecesBifidobacteriumMicrobiologyClostridiumMedicineBiologyBacteriaInternal medicineImmunologyMetaboliteFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To cite this article: Francavilla R, Calasso M, Calace L, Siragusa S, Ndagijimana M, Vernocchi P, Brunetti L, Mancino G, Tedeschi G, Guerzoni E, Indrio F, Laghi L, Miniello VL, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. Effect of lactose on gut microbiota and metabolome of infants with cow’s milk allergy. Pediatric Allergy Immunology 2012: 23 : 420–427. Abstract Allergic infants have an unusual gastrointestinal microbiota with low numbers of Bifidobacterium /Lactobacilli and high levels of Clostridium , staphylococci and Escherichia coli. Hydrolyzed formula used to treat these infants is deprived of lactose that instead may influence the gut microbial composition. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of lactose on the composition of the gut microbiota and metabolome of infants with cow’s milk allergy. Infants prospectively enrolled received an extensively hydrolyzed formula with no lactose for 2 months followed by an identical lactose‐containing formula for an additional 2 months. Healthy, age‐gender‐matched infants were used as controls. The following determinations were performed before and after the introduction of lactose in the diet: enumeration of cells present in the feces using FISH, counts of viable bacterial cells and gas‐chromatography mass spectrometry/solid‐phase microextraction analysis. The addition of lactose to the diet significantly increases the counts of Bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria (p < 0.01), decreases that of Bacteroides/clostridia (p < 0.05) reaching counts found in healthy controls; lactose significantly increases the concentration of total short‐chain fatty acids (p < 0.05). The addition of lactose to an extensively hydrolyzed formula is able to positively modulate the composition of gut microbiota by increasing the total fecal counts of Lactobacillus/Bifidobacteria and decreasing that of Bacteroides/Clostridia. The positive effect is completed by the increase of median concentration of short chain fatty acids, especially for acetic and butyric acids demonstrated by the metabolomic analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Allergy and ImmunologySame topicInfant Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207