Silver : 25 Years of Artist-Run Culture : The New Gallery's Retrospective Catalogue : 1975 - 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This retrospective publication (and exhibition) marks the 25th anniversary of The New Gallery, an artist-run centre previously known as “The Clouds ‘n’ Water Gallery” and “Off Centre Centre.” The exhibition consisted of works by almost 50 artists from Canada and abroad who have been involved with the gallery at different times throughout its history. The publication contains essays by three authors who trace the evolution of The New Gallery over the past 25 years. Jacobson’s text on the early years of ARCs (artist-run centres), focuses on the impact that “Workshop” (the first artist collective in Calgary) and “Dandelion” (an artist collective and magazine) had on Calgary’s arts community. Mabie’s essay on “Clouds ‘n’ Water” and “Off Centre Centre,” underlines the importance of artist-run culture in the 1970s. Definitions of what an ARC is, and problems related to funding non-profit arts organisations are also considered. T. Jonsson’s essay centres on the relationship between artist-run culture and the mainstream Canadian art world. Other topics discussed by Jonsson include: social and economic factors that have influenced ARCs, reasons for the change of name from “parallel gallery” to “artist-run centre,” and changing definitions of identity/community within Canadian art. Includes a detailed chronology of The New Gallery’s exhibitions and events from 1975 - 2000, as well as appendices listing volunteers and members of the centre, individual and corporate donors, funding agencies and critics/media coverage. Circa 36 bibl. ref.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".