Addressing the Democratic Deficit: Women and Political Culture in Atlantic Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper questions the notion that women in the Atlantic region are uniquely hobbled by conservatism and traditionalism in their political choices, arguing instead that resistence to women's full participation in formal political structures is a national phenomenon and that Atlantic Canada's political marginalization within the federal framework serves as the context for women's political marginalization in the region.It also argues that the failure to address the exclusivity of our political structures constitutes a "democratic deficit," a serious loss of talent that we can ill-afford at the dawn of the twenty-first century.RESUME Cet article questionne la notion que les femmes de la region de l'Atlantique sont uniquement entravee par le conservatisme et le traditionalisme de leurs choix politiques, discutant plutot que la resistance envers la participation totale des femmes dans les structures politiques formelles est un phenomene national et que la marginalisation politique au Canada Atlantique a rinterieur du cadre federal sert de contexte pour la marginalisation des femmes dans la region.II discute aussi du fait que de ne pas adresser Pexclusivite de nos structures politiques constitue un deficit politique, une grande perte de talent que nous ne pouvons nous permettre a l'aube du vingt et unieme siecle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".