MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1563884880

"It Looks at All of You" -- Elders' Understanding and Utilization of Traditional Medicines in a Canadian First Nation Community

2010· preprint· en· W1563884880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ralph Matthews, Tamara Jennifer Ibrahim, Anne Martin-Matthews

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecrecyLife expectancyNeglectEmpirical researchPopulationMedicinePharmacyHealth carePublic relationsEconomic growthPolitical scienceNursingEnvironmental healthLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First Nation (Native Indian) people in Canada have higher incidences of every major disease than do the Canadian population, as well as higher infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy. Calls for a new approach to health service delivery for aboriginal people emphasize the importance of community based treatment and the incorporation of traditional medicines and healing approaches. However, there has been little empirical research on how widespread traditional health knowledge and practices are after decades of suppression and neglect. Neither is there much empirical information regarding the relation of traditional approaches to 'western' mainstream practices. This paper presents findings from in-depth interviews with 52 Elders (over age 55) in the Tseshaht First Nation of British Columbia. The study was carried out with the permission and cooperation of the Tseshaht Band Council. Our data show that, despite being located near the medical facilities of a nearby city, support for and utilization of traditional medicines by Elders in the community remain widespread. Traditional medicines are generally not regarded by Elders as medications, but as means to link the individual holistically with the spirit and with nature. They are said to work because they engage the individual through faith in their capacity to cure holistically. Respondents reported little opposition from bio-medically trained medical practitioners, but suggested that traditional secrecy about such medicines hamper any efforts to link them directly with outside medical practices. Given the advantages of having aboriginal people involved in their own health care, coupled with the secrecy required by traditional practices, we recommend the parallel development of native healing programs integrated with mainstream medical treatment strategies as an appropriate approach to the health problems of Canada's First Nation communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→