MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563958648 · doi:10.1080/15320380802425063

An Evaluative Screening Level Model of the Fate of Organic Chemicals in Sludge-Amended Soils Including Organic Matter Degradation

2008· article· en· W1563958648 on OpenAlexafffund
Lauren Hughes, Eva Webster, Don Mackay

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiosolidsSoil waterOrganic matterEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceVolatilisationLeaching (pedology)Degradation (telecommunications)AmendmentBioturbationSoil organic matterSewage sludgeSoil scienceEnvironmental engineeringChemistrySewageGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Biosolids-Amended Soil: Level IV (BASL4) evaluative screening level model of the fate of organic chemicals introduced to a two-layer soil in association with contaminated biosolids amendments is described. The model is intended for use in assessing the likely month-to-month and year-to-year fate and possible build-up of chemicals in sludge-amended soils in which there can be relatively rapid degradation of the organic matter (OM) present in the applied sludge. To accomplish this goal, processes of chemical degradation, inter-layer transport, volatilization, leaching, diffusion, sorbed phase transport due to bioturbation, and degradation of both fast and slow degrading OM present in the soil and amendment are quantified. Chemical can be introduced as pure compound or in biosolids; it may be applied to the surface layer of the soil or injected into a deeper layer of soil, and it may be ploughed into the surface and deeper layer. BASL4 was applied illustratively to three dissimilar chemicals: DDT, benzene, and phenol for a 12-month simulation period. Several simulations of DDT fate in different amended and unamended soil scenarios demonstrate the capabilities of the model. Degradation of OM is shown to significantly affect partitioning between solids, pore water, and pore air and hence the fate of the chemicals. A preliminary evaluation of the model is described by simulating three field and laboratory studies and the results are regarded as being in reasonable accord with observations. A sensitivity analysis is included with the objective of determining the relative importance of the various parameters describing chemical and soil properties. The model is a useful tool for evaluating the potential for soil contamination under conditions of OM degradation, for identifying the need for soil monitoring studies, and as a basis for estimating concentrations in soil-dwelling organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil and Sediment Contamination An International JournalSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207