Repeated inspiratory occlusions acutely impair myocardial function in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Repeated episodes of hypoxia and sympathetic activation during obstructive sleep apnoea are implicated in the initiation and progression of cardiovascular diseases, but the acute effects are unknown. We hypothesized that repeated inspiratory occlusions cause acute myocardial dysfunction and injury. In 22 spontaneously breathing pentobarbital-anaesthetized rats, inspiration was occluded for 30 s every 2 min for 3 h. After approximately 1.5 h, mean arterial pressure started to fall; heart rate between occlusions was stable throughout, consistent with only transient increases in sympathetic activity during each occlusion. Three hours of occlusions resulted in ventricular diastolic dysfunction (reduced peak rate of change of ventricular pressure and slower relaxation). Post-occlusions, the left ventricular contractile response to dobutamine was blunted. After 1 h of recovery, left ventricular pressure generation had returned to values no different from those in sham animals in 5 of 9 of the animals. Cardiac myofibrils from rats subjected to occlusions had depressed calcium-activated myosin ATPase activity, indicating myofilament contractile dysfunction that was not due to breakdown of contractile proteins. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained cross-sections revealed multifocal areas of necrosis within the septum and both ventricles. Repeated inspiratory occlusions, analogous to moderately severe obstructive sleep apnoea, acutely cause global cardiac dysfunction with multifocal myocardial infarcts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".