MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564006266 · doi:10.1109/holm.2004.1353113

High contact resistance readings on clean microwave mobile contacts

2004· article· en· W1564006266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyContact resistanceMaterials scienceCarbon fibersMonolayerContact angleOxygenAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChemical engineeringComposite materialLayer (electronics)ChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a real-life environment, metallic surfaces are always covered with an insulating film of some type. This can be partly minimized by the use of noble metals for contacts, but even in case of gold, the best material in terms of reactivity with the environment, such films occur. The contact resistance consists therefore in constriction resistance and film (or tunneling) resistance. Gold is known to have little affinity in creating frictional polymers (5% when compared with platinum) but it is known to have some affinity regarding absorption of carbon atoms forming the so-called carbon-oxygen film. Analysis of contacts that exhibited high contact resistance revealed presence of carbon and oxygen imbedded in the reed and probe contact surfaces. These carbon/oxygen areas were not visually identifiable using standard optical techniques, including UV light, and standard inspection magnification of 20 to 40 x. X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis revealed that there were no other elements present in the contact and non contact areas of the corresponding paths except Au, C and O. At the same time, measured bonding energies for carbon and oxygen, confirmed the most probable composition of the carbonaceous monolayer. Non-contact areas taken as a background in the evaluation had slightly different composition, however with the same type of carbon structures i.e. bonding energies. XPS measurements conducted on various contacts showed that the thickness of such a film is usually less than 10 nm. The work presents an analysis that shows, based on RF data interpretation, that the mobile contact member and the fixed contact member were in intimate contact and the equivalent dielectric constant of the insulating layer is higher than one. In addition, using typical values for the tunnel resistivity presented in reference books by R. Holm and K. E. Pitney it is possible to obtain high contact resistance readings comparable with the experimental data. Paper also examines test methodology and limitations in terms of ability to detect tunnel conduction through certain thicknesses of surface films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it